Sunday, 6 December 2015
The Sexiest Movie Never Made
Little matters whether Gaspar Noe's French drama "Love" (2015) is a porno-flick or a tasteful porno-flick. It isn't just about the sex in its 135 minutes, okay? But a dangerous menage a trois, unspooling creamily lit bodies into dance-like sculptures as they copulate and fall away like all doomed-to-fail relationships. Sorta.
I've never watched a Gaspar Noe movie for the same reason I've never heard about him. But a quick search dredged up numerous results of how, beside the underground director's previous films (i.e. Irreversible, Enter the Void), "Love" was bore, a letdown, a beautiful hazy dream that's also disappointingly softcore- for a movie that pronounced itself hardcore with 3D come-flying stunts by actor Karl Glusman's penis. Gaspar Noe is second to Lars Von Trier, after the latter got banned from Cannes for being a Nazi sympathizer. What both men have in common, however, is the titular "enfant terrible" title they share of in cinema. Misfits don't make blockbusters- they make artful underdog films like "Love", for fans.
Thusly, my virgin experience at Noe's titillating melodrama.
Within 30 minutes into the intimate space Noe staged, I was stupefied, amused, empathetic, and- also- very bored. While not all at once, I was delighted by the unsuspecting intro of watching two people whacking each other off. There, naked, Murphy (Klusman) has a finger in his later-known girlfriend Electra (Aomi Muyock), who's returning the favor as she holds onto his penis like a crutch. But unlike the erotically charged Ang Lee breakthrough, "Lust, Caution", "Love" couldn't save itself from becoming a laughable morass, even after an hour into what out and out sex only the French can perform without making one feel molested just watching.
Of course, "Love" should have been a serious movie. The takeaway at the end is a tragedy of a couple's misguided trust in each other. Murphy plays a callous role in manhood's woes, and Electra is a stunning femme fatale with problems only enigmatic female characters possess (which isn't very much). Where they fortify their relationship, albeit the messes, is in the hot sex they often share. Until the threesome with their neighbor Omi (Klara Kristin), which led to the cheating, and a baby born out of wedlock, watching Murphy and Electra pre-break in flashbacks was like watching two foolhardy teenagers in love profess an eternity: A shallow, regrettable experience.
Why did I submit myself to a long, tepid movie laden with depressive monologues and full-frontal private parts sliding off the screen like a Gustave Courbet painting? For the art? If only, when all I felt in the merits lost- Benoit Debie has staged remarkable love scenes here, especially in the bordello glow of Murphy's bedroom- was a sense of restlessness. Who knew sex could be boring? Watching "Love" was like watching strangers getting it on in their Parisian apartments through a peephole. And without any depth, the characters quickly became flat and stale, when they should've been as deep and total as their thickets of pubic hair.
Yes, I definitely watched it for the sex. No shame.
Labels:
Drama,
French,
Gaspar Noe,
Karl Glusman,
Love,
Sex
Thursday, 3 December 2015
Inside Tending to Your Organisation, a Training Guide For All CEOs
![]() |
| A Bountiful Harvest: Promoting Diversified Thinking |
Tending to Your Organisation is a training manual for managerial positions and frontline workers alike. It aims to segue a company's cultural competency in its workplace.
Over the course of two months, every team in class was tasked to create a comprehensive manual that'd be graded for an Organizational Communication module. Albeit a school project, professionalism was expected from every work members of the class produced. The individual manuals- based on a list of relevant topics pertaining to the said module- would then be pitched to a class who'd play an imagined audience (i.e. HR managers, CEOs). Its totality would be assessed based on one's understanding on the subject matter.
My team's pick was Cultural Competency, a study in one's aptitude across a cross-cultural setting. By proffering skills to readers to hone their own competency, the challenge was to underscore the manual's objectives and benefits to prospective clients in a presentation.
Challenge:
It's too narrow to limit culture to a language or a skin colour, according to anyone with the common wisdom to know of different races, ethnicities, and genders. The view on culture encompasses a wider set of examples. Personal experiences, values, beliefs, attitudes- culture can be summed as a way of how people lived, in brief. It is a worldview.
The challenge then, was to present its competency as a benefit to our clients' interest. Anyone who cares enough must be informed and persuaded to the benefits of a healthy workplace culture.
Insight:
Cultural competency isn't a bottom line that reaps monetary benefits, once mastered- nobody can guarantee that. Neither is it a problem like workplace conflict, which can be nipped by changing one's methods at absolving conflicted interests. However, if its ambiguous non-referent idea had a strategic posture, it'd be that cultural competency is a value. And like all values, cultural competency cannot be trained. It has to be aspired in people.
By equipping CEOs with an education, the values would, thus, cascade downward to all members of an organization. The objective was to create an open, trusting, and inclusive workplace culture.
Execution:
The manual- which could take on any form of presentation- was marketed as a guidebook.
And like all natural practices, one's company culture needs tending. The guidebook rules out the dogmatic prescriptions of telling CEOs what they should do with their own companies. Instead, it coaches them throughout various organizational phases, from the start- at the importance of a better hiring process- to the tail- once an employee has settled within the company.
Thusly, its title and successive chapters:
![]() |
| Tending to Your Organisation: A Guide to Honing Your Cultural Competency |
![]() |
| A Budding Organisation |
![]() |
| From Friction to Fruition: Managing Conflict Effectively |
My role as team leader and copywriter was not only to materialize all members' ideas into its content, but also to buttress our pitch with copy for the promotional ads. We avoided the cliches of an emotional appeal (that meant no poverty porn or any exploitative tactics at the expense of the minority). Rather, targeted at CEOs, we wanted a strong voice of reason to speak for itself.
As a first part of a trio of simplistic ads, this is a double page spread written, and presented formally, to promote the training guide:
![]() |
| Enlarge to read text |
Next, with an interest directed to our audience, who're all CEOs and leaders in their own stride, my team I made two OOH ads. We wanted the headlines to be concise, yet promising to its reach, with a bare-bone layout and clear message:
Finally, the highest stakeholder for our audience (What do CEOs want?) is, in fact, their own intended audience whereby company growth relies upon those relationships; their customers:
![]() |
| Enlarge to read text |
Cultural competency is an opportunity.
Results:
Tending to Your Organization has earned my team and I high points for the content and its presentation format. We too, leagued amongst the top three of presentations, voted by populist choice. Although we were eventually won out by peers with their leisurely pitches, my team and I believe a pitch doesn't share the same name as a sketch. We leaned our sales message- without the fat.
Monday, 30 November 2015
Tag (2015) Isn't The Movie You Think it is.
The vilification of women, the punishable aggression inflicted upon them, the voyeuristic lens that peeks at their panties every time a gale sweeps up schoolgirls' skirts- Tag (2015) should have been made in poor taste, considering Japanese auteur Sion Sono's vita of films dedicated to the sexploitation of women (Love Exposure, The Virgin Psychics).
But it wasn't. Instead, Tag became a vision of modern cinema and a compelling study in gender roles. All in its scant 90 minutes of surrealistic dream sequences that'd leave you bewildered, yet, strangely, wanting for more.
Set in small town Japan, the film's unusual happenings unravels with a thriller when two school buses (packed with laughing high schoolgirls looking as sunburst as an ad from Sovil Titus) gets sliced into half by a mysterious gust of wind. Saved by coincidence, the timid lone survivor, Mitsuko (played charmingly by Austrian-Japanese actress Reina Triendl), begins a race for her life from a series of attackers.
Part of Sono's third release of six films he scheduled for 2015, Tag trails behind the teen-survival genre he's been made famous by. But where the plot thickens, as it veers away from the campy destruction of entire high school of females, is at the vein of the movie: an element of gender oppression.
As Mitsuko jumps from one paranormal encounter with bazuka-wielding teachers to another with a bovine bride, her idenity travels inter-dimensionally with her. From the ingenue she is, to the conflicted bride Keiko (Mariko Shinoda), to the marathoner Izumi (Erina Mano), the all-female cast prevalent in two-thirds of the movie- until we fall into the rabbit hole of a male-dominated dystopia toward the end- pounds at a tough fact of life often overlooked: its characters are running away from a rite of passage society has prescribed, from adolescence to adulthood.
Orchestrating the movie to sublime effect is also its film score. It matches the revealing scene when Mitsuko confronts the true enemy of her fictitious drama: men; particularly, men who fetishizes the Japanese schoolgirl culture enough to create the insufferable reality we find ourselves trapped in. And by the film's close, the music falls away into post-rock group Mono's beautiful soundtrack, a tireless melody of downtempo guitar and bass.
Perhaps, what's even stranger than fiction- a cinematic experience I reserve for astounding films- was the lump I swallowed at the back of my throat after a movie as cerebral, as violent, and as offsetting as Tag. While modern day directors strike the iron of feminism while it's hot topic to avert the male gaze, Sion Sono's awe-inspiring work brings it back in the most visceral, most grotesque, and most beautiful way possible. He wasn't turning away from a problem, he was staring right into its dispassionate, ugly face.
Below, its official trailer and (yes!) full movie.
Monday, 16 November 2015
Humanity's Last Straw For Apocalyptic Movies: Attack on Titan
There're apocalyptic movies, and there're post-apocalyptic movies. Remember World War Z? The former's zombie-infested planet Brad Pitt tried to save- adapted from the eponymous novel by Max Brooks? Faintly, I do. Like other viewers who paid money then to be convinced by the end of the world, I was more bored than entertained. That said, in 2015, manga-turned-blockbuster Attack on Titan comes second to snooze.
While you can't fault the apocalyptic genre (2012, anyone?) even after a series of blockbuster flops, directors should know its feature isn't the easiest to make or adapt. On literature, readers lucidly dream up all the fantasy, the action and the pandemonium. Though, onscreen, only the filmmaker controls what viewers see.
Similarly, there isn't much to digest here, apart from the artfully created monsters known as "Titans". Released in August with a sequel following the world-saving manga-adapted movie this month, Attack on Titan centers around humanity's battle against flesh-eating giants. They're nightmarish colossal duds; though, unlike childhood fables, Titans don't break out into nursery rhymes. They groan, shriek, and cackle while masticating human limbs with blood splayed to great CGI-effect. But those were just the best bits.
Set in an imagined agricultural society in close-to-extinct Japan, the film departs from the manga's German heritage. Which isn't the only difference, nor is it a problem to anyone who hasn't read the manga. While its people are walled up in a fortress to protect themselves from the Titans, the real problem began when the entire town was wrecked to rubble. Onward, upended lives didn't matter in the face of terror. Only the action did to take down the obvious enemy.
Of course, Attack on Titan is a different movie from the tropes of zombie attacks and natural disasters; it's a monster blockbuster, like Godzilla. Hefty with actions sequences between Titan-killing scouts (formed by the film's main trio Eren, Armin, and Mikasa, who's played by model/actress Kiko Mizuhara) and the monsters, the gory action should have made up for the lack of emotional responses from its characters. However, apart from the repeated saying, "I want to kill Titans", nobody really knows why their saving their world.
By the end, humanity's shared values didn't really matter anyway because the takeaway message was clear: we're only as vulnerable as the cattle bred. Okay. And the "true enemy is the fence [that's keeping us in]". That those lives who lost families, houses, and entire villages didn't cost its own unique story arc as much as they were lunch to the Titans, this movie has also served up a sequel aimed to unravel all its plot holes. Perhaps, humanity's apocalyptic blockbuster should really be canned.
Monday, 9 November 2015
You're Not Too Smart For Your Own Good. You're Just Not Persuasive.
If Dale Carneige were still alive, he'd have been 127 years old. And the writer, lecturer, and self-help guru would still want you to know that you're not communicating unless you're doing it with empathy.
Don't get it confused with honesty, or a concern with your co-worker's affairs- that's gossip. Empathy is loftier than you think. Empathy is, according to Carnegie, a people skill that helps you level with others, put yourself in their shoes, and walk a mile in their Nike Fly Knit's, even.
"[It] is so simple, so obvious, that anyone ought to see the truth of it at a glance; yet 90 percent of the people on this earth ignore it 90 percent of the time," says the writer. Which is why, reading his book, How to Win Friends And Influence People, might actually benefit you its working title. You know, to actually have some friends and get people to your thinking.
First published in 1936, HTWFAIP is trawled with comprehensive tips and painstakingly detailed with insightful anecdotes. For a book that has survived reprints since, selling 15 million copies, in 31 languages worldwide, it is a determined, digestible guide. (Yes, that is a part of empathy. On the reader.) His job, a career that has helped Man self-actualize his potential, with tips from "getting people to like you" to winning them over to your ideas, is simple: It's not what you say, but how you say it.
In a chapter where Carnegie analyzes a business letter from an ad-man flawed with self-importance, he offers this in return:
Who cares what your company desires? I am worried about my own problems. The bank is foreclosing the mortgage on my house, the bugs are destroying the hollyhocks, the stock market tumbled yesterday. I missed the eight-fifteen this morning, I wasn't invited to the Jones's dance last night, the doctor tells me I have high blood pressure and neuritis and dandruff. And then what happens? I come down to the office this morning worried, open my mail and here is some whippersnapper off in New York yapping about what his company wants. Bah! If he only realized what sort of impression his letter makes, he would get out of advertising business and start manufacturing sheep dip.
They don't say, but that's exactly how people feel every time you sit on their faces with the highfalutin "I"-mentality. It may be hard not to be an asshole, but people management is one topical interest that'd never pass up from judgement. You don't want to be that guy.
And neither does Dale Carnegie. He doesn't want you to be "honest to a fault". No, he doesn't want you confusing pompous, condescending honesty with empathy. He wants you to get fixed up with the right manners, instantly. Your job then, reader, is to grab a copy.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







